Attorney Randall Scarlett of San Rafael celebrated this weekend after
learning that his 13-yearold with Exxon Corp. for the Exxon Valdez oil
spill in Alaska might be nearing end.
A federal judge reduced the punitive award against Exxon Corp. for
spilling 11 million gallons of crude oil into Prince William Sound -
but only 20 percent. U.S. District Judge Russel Holland in a ruling
late Friday reduced the original $5 billion punitive damages award to
$4 billion.
This $4 billion judgment would be a tremendous victory for the plaintiffs, Scarlett said.
Scarlett represents 750 plaintiffs in the case through his San
Francisco firm, Scarlett Law Group. His clients mostly fisherman, fish
industry workers, and land owners, have waited too long to recoup
damages, he said. "We've had clients who have died," he said. "Many
have lost their boats, lost their homes."
A spokesman for Exxon Mobile said the company will appeal.
"Our position is no punitive damages are really warranted in this case," Tom Cirigliano told the Associated Press.
Scarrlett said Holland's decision to reaffirm a large punitive award
against the company will be hard for the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
to find fault with.
"We're getting closer to the end of this thing, closer to victory for
those plaintiffs who have waited and waited," Scarlett said. "It means
so much to so many people, so many who have suffered. They have been to
hell and back over this."
Dave Oesting, lead counsel for the roughly 32,000 plaintiffs, which
include fishermen, communities, businesses and landowners, said he was
pleased with the decision. He said Judge Holland followed guidelines
ordered by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
"He believes $4 billion is an appropriate number, nothing less," Oesting said.
An Alaska jury in 1994 approved the big award in the Exxon Valdez oil
spill. After the verdict, Exxon appealed to the 9th Circuit, which
agreed with the company that the award was "excessive."
Exxon argued that the company was effectively punished and deterred by
billions it had paid out in cleanup costs, compensation to hundreds of
claimants and government fines.
That included $300 million in damages, compared to actual damages of
$287 million, Cirigliano said, plus $2.2 billion in cleanup costs.
"We had claims offices set up throughout Prince William Sound and down to Seattle," Cirigliano said.
Holland heard arguments in the case in October. Attorneys for Exxon
said "a huge reduction" was required. Exxon Mobil Vice President and
General Counsel Charles Matthews said Friday Holland's latest ruling
will be appealed.
"This ruling flies in the face of the guidelines set by the appeals
court when they sent this case back to Judge Holland," Matthews said.